Legal Opinion

Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1981No. 51128PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

Plaintiff John Grouse appeals from a judgment in favor of Group Health Plan, Inc., in this action for damages resulting from repudiation of an employment offer. The narrow issue raised is whether the trial court erred by concluding that Grouse’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In our view, the doctrine of promissory estoppel entitles Grouse to recover and we, therefore, reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of damages.

The facts relevant to this appeal are essentially undisputed. Grouse, a 1974 graduate of the University of Minnesota…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Degen v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Hackett v. Foodmaker, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Karen Snow v. Ridgeview Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Schoff v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API