Legal Opinion
Fay v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1958No. 20581PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
This action and Abraham v. United States (Admiralty No. 20567) have been brought pursuant to the Public Vessels Act, 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 781-790, to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by libelants while employed by independent contractors aboard the respondent’s vessels. It appears from the affidavits that ’ Fay was employed as a pipe-fitter by Bethlehem Steel Company which was engaged in stevedoring work on the vessel U.S.N.S. Aucilla, and that Abraham was employed as a longshoreman by Imparato Stevedoring Corporation, performing stevedoring work…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mosseller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Bank Line, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- The PotomacSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. William H. Webster, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Reed Paper Co. v. Procter & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1992
- United States v. Dorothy McAllisterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Boston Diagnostics Development Corp. v. Kollsman Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Proseus v. Anchor Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.