Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
The plaintiff’s second amended complaint sets forth ten claims in separate counts and seeks to recover damages stemming from the presence of hazardous material on his property in Woburn. Named as defendants are Lipton Industries, Inc. (Lipton), the seller of the property, and Algonquin, Inc. (Algonquin), the real estate brokerage company involved in the sale. A judge of the Superior Court allowed the defendants’ motions for summary judgment as to all ten counts and entered a separate judgment for each defendant. We hold that summary judgment was improper on four of the six counts against…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- William R. Gooley v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Dedham Water Company and Dedham-Westwood Water District v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- VMark Software, Inc. v. EMC Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.