Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Giannis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 16, 2005No. 2-04-1155PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Marshall Bauer, purchased a home from defendants, Nick Giannis and Donna Giannis. Four years later, the basement flooded after a heavy rain. Alleging that defendants concealed that the basement had flooded once before the sale, plaintiff sued defendants for fraud. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for summary-judgment and, finding that an “as is” clause contained in the real estate sale contract was unenforceable, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment.

Thereafter, the trial court certified three questions for interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Schrager v. North Community BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Arnold R. Rissman v. Owen Randall Rissman and Robert Dunn GlickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Pappas v. Pella Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Rozsavolgyi v. The City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Liliya Turubchuk v. Southern Illinois Asphalt CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Sassak v. City of Park RidgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API