Dexter v. Spokane County Health District
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
This action involves a fraud claim brought by Forrest Dexter against Robert Dixon. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Mr. Dixon on the basis of issue and claim preclusion and awarded sanctions pursuant to CR 11. Mr. Dexter contends: (1) the subject matter of this suit is distinct from that in controversy in previous litigation; (2) his position was not so unfounded as to warrant sanctions; (3) even if sanctions were appropriate, the award is not supported by findings; and (4) the order awarding sanctions is void because it was entered in the absence of a presentment hearing.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens & Associates Engineers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Sylvester v. ImhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Meyer v. HubbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Gustafson v. MazerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Pratt v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.