Legal Opinion

Biggs v. Vail

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1994No. 59938-6PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Attorney Patrick Biggs challenges the imposition of civil rule (CR) 11 sanctions by the trial court following the issuance of this court’s mandate in Biggs v. Vail, 119 Wn.2d 129, 830 P.2d 350 (1992) (Biggs I). His arguments rest primarily on the assumption that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter such sanctions after the issuance of the mandate. We disagree, and hold that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court had authority to consider and impose CR 11 sanctions even after the substantive issues had been decided. However, we find that the trial court did not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API