Legal Opinion
FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Edwards
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 27, 2006No. C05-946CPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave To File Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 132), Defendants’ Opposition thereto and Cross-Motion To Dismiss Litigation Fraud Claims (Dkt.Nos.146, 147), Plaintiffs’ Reply (Dkt. No. 148), Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Cross-Motion (Dkt. No. 155), and Defendants’ Reply (Dkt. No. 161). Having considered the papers submitted by the parties on these cross-motions and finding oral argument unnecessary, the Court finds and rules as follows.
I. BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Verifone Securities Litigation. Martin Halkin Michael Minichino Lois Steen Richard Marchesi David J. Steinberg Chaille Steinberg v. Verifone Inc. Robertson Stephens, Robertson Stephens and Company, Martin Halkin Michael Minichino Lois Steen Richard Marchesi David J. Steinberg Chaille Steinberg v. Verifone Inc. William F. Gorog John R.C. Porter Keith B. Greeslin H.H. Haight, IV William N. Melton Frank J. Caufield Hatim A. Tyabji Morgan Stanley & Co. Robertson Stephens Dean Witter Reynolds Incorporated Burton McMurtryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Zimmerman v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.