In Re the Claim for Benefits by Sletten
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
On certiorari appeal from a determination of the Minnesota Public Safety Officer Eligibility Panel (MPSOEP) denying his claim for continuing payment of employer’s contribution to health insurance coverage under Minn.Stat. § 299A.465, subd. 1 (2006), relator argues that MPSOEP erred in denying his claim for benefits. Relator argues that regardless of whether the focus is on a 2002 injury involving moving a chair, or a 2004 injury involving a cave rescue, he is entitled to benefits because both injuries occurred while he was acting within the scope of his duties as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Claim for Benefits by MeulenersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Medical License of FriedensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re the Claim for Benefits by SloanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.