Legal Opinion
Killion v. Davis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 31, 2001No. SC 16417PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether the attorney trial referee’s conclusion that the defendant, Ian Martin Davis, personally was liable to the plaintiffs, T. Christopher Killion and Brad J. Felenstein, was supported by the referee’s findings of fact. The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with a report issued by the attorney trial referee recommending that the defendant personally be held liable for breach of an employment contract. The Appellate Court reversed, concluding that the attorney trial referee’s conclusion was not supported by the facts in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Elgar v. ElgarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Post Road Iron Works, Inc. v. Lexington Development Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Original Grasso Construction Co. v. ShepherdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- MacMillan v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Killion v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.