Spence v. . Granger
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.
The question involved: Vas the court below correct in retaining the cause on the docket to the end that a determination of the issues of fact raised by Exception No. 1 of movants or protestants may be considered? We think so. This cause has heretofore been before this Court. Spence v. Granger, 204 N. C., 247. One of the fundamental principles of law which has come down to us “from time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary” is that every party affected by an action or proceeding is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard. The original trouble in this whole matter was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Roseman v. Roseman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- In Re AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Faison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- County of Alameda v. CliffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bynum v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.