Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bynum v. . Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1DissentBarnhill, J.

STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., concur in dissent. The order and decree of the court below indicates the controversy and is as follows:

"This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding over the Superior Court of Durham County at the request of counsel for Leon W. Powell, Administrator of the Estate of Joanna Leathers, upon the appeal of the plaintiff duly taken from the order of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Durham County entered on the 4th day of April, 1940, at which hearing in the Superior Court both the plaintiff Mattie Bynum and the defendant. The Fidelity…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Newman v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Roseman v. Roseman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Faison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Town of Hudson v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. In re Adoption of DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API