Legal Opinion

Harrell v. . Welstead

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

I£ it be conceded that the answer of the defendants was not properly filed (Michie’s Code, sec. 509), or was not filed in time, then the judgment by default and inquiry is void as to the corporate defendant, for said defendant had never been summoned to appear in Currituck County. Its summons was to appear before the clerk of the Superior Court of Pasquotank County and answer the complaint filed in his office. Therefore, unless the corporate defendant had come in by answer, it was not in court at all, and the judgment is without warrant of law as to it. Bank v. Wilson, 80 N. C., 200. By the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. York v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Harrington v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API