Legal Opinion

In Re Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1903PublishedCited by 31 opinions

A special proceeding for the appointment of a guardian of J. T. Anderson, beard by Judge R. B. Bryan, at September Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of PeNder County. From a judgment appointing a guardian, J. T. Anderson, through his attorneys, appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This proceeding was originally commenced before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Pender County, for the purpose of having a guardian appointed for J. T. Anderson, under the provisions of Section 1670 of The Code. The affidavits on which the proceeding was based did not contain matter in which it was averred that Anderson was an idiot, or an inebriate, or a lunatic, but it was affirmed substantially that he was- “incompetent for want of understanding, to manage his- own affairs.” A most serious matter, both to the public and to the individual person, was involved in the question presented to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roseman v. Roseman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Faison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Ledbetter v. . PinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Armstrong v. . ShortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1820

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Perry v. BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Perry v. . BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Hall v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API