Legal Opinion

Liberto v. Steele

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

*530Petitioner for certiorari, Liberto et al., and respondents, Steele and wife, own adjoining lots fronting on Washington Avenue in Memphis and running back north to an alley. The Liberto lot is east of the Steele lot. Embraced within the total area of the two lots, and in or near the center thereof, is a strip fronting 7.6 feet on Washington Avenue and 14.3 feet on the alley to the rear. Por more than forty years, this strip has been included within the description of the recorded deeds to Liberto, and his predecessors in title, but never within the description in the recorded deeds to Steele…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. French v. PearceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  2. De Rossett Hat Co. v. London Lancashire Fire Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kirkman v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Erck v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Peoples v. HagamanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wilson v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Lemm v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Frumin v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. Foster v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API