Legal Opinion

Erck v. Church

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1889PublishedCited by 21 opinions

EROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. B. M. Estes, Ch. Ejectment bill. Decree for complainant. Defendant appealed. J. M. Gregory for ' Complainant. G-antt & PatteksoN for Defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

* J. M. Dickinson, Sp. J.

Complainant filed this bill September 25, 1886, to recover possession of a parcel of land in Memphis, fronting three feet and ten inches on Lauderdale Street, and five feet seven and one-half inches on Humphries Street, being three hundred and nine feet in length.

It is admitted that complainant has a good legal title, and that he has a right to recover, unless it has been defeated by the operation of the statute of limitations.

*577Mackall sold and deeded to Warner a lot contiguous to the parcel in dispute, fronting fifty feet on Lauderdale Street, • and the same width, on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. French v. PearceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  2. Weber v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. BudziszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Rennert v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Rowland v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API