Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Price

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 22, 2005PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · FarmerDavid R. Farmer, J.

in which W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined.

Plaintiff Price brought this cause of action for ejectment. Defendant Wilson invoked the affirmative defenses of adverse possession, the statutory limitations period prescribed at Tennessee Code Annotated § 28-2-103, and laches. The trial court determined that Defendant had not met the elements of adverse possession upon finding Defendant’s use of Plaintiffs property was permissive. The trial court entered judgment for Plaintiff, and Defendant appeals. We reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand for entry of…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bowden v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. County of Shelby v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. O'Brien v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Hightower v. PendergrassTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Chavez v. Broadway Electric Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  3. Foust v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  4. Alexander A. Stratienko v. Oscar H. BrockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  5. Amos v. Lampo Group, LLC, TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API