Kirkman v. Brown
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM CHEATHAM. Appeal from Chancery Court of Cheatham County. G-eo. E. Seay, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.
This is an ejectment bill filed in tbe Chancery Court of Cheatham County, in which complainants seek to recover the possession of 1,000 acres of land. The hill as originally filed was to prevent waste and to enjoin the defendants from cutting timber from said land.
The Chancellor decreed that ■ the logs already cut came from the land of complainants, but were not cut from the land involved in this controversy. There was a decree in favor of the complainants for the value of the logs, but the Chancellor was of opinion that, in respect to the land claimed by these defendants, their title was…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Peoples v. HagamanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Buchanan v. NixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Hydas v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
- Liberto v. SteeleTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.