Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 25, 1974No. 5536, C.A.D. 1116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MaRket, Ohief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States. Customs Court, 70 Cust. Ct. 80, C.D. 4411, 358 F. Sup. 280 (1973) sustaining appellee’s claim that the subject merchandise was improperly classified. We reverse.

TlIE IMPORTATIONS

The merchandise consists of two kinds of transistorized printed wiring board assemblies, one invoiced as a “control board” and the other-as a “protective circuit board.” Both assemblies are used as parts of a pulse modulation system for operating fork lift trucks. In such a system, the motor is supplied with energy in distinct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Midland International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. General Electric Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. Ampex Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. New York Merchandise Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. E.R. Hawthorne & Co., Inc., A/c Veped Traffic Controls, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Rembrandt Electronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  3. Amaco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. United States v. Miracle Exclusives, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API