Legal Opinion
United States v. Rembrandt Electronics, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 21, 1976No. C.A.D. 1175; No. 76-4PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MarKey, Chief Judge.
The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 75 Cust. Ct. —, C.D. 4613, 405 F. Supp. 588 (1975) sustaining appellee’s (Rembrandt’s) claim that certain imported television antenna switches are classifiable as “television apparatus, and parts thereof,” under item 685.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) rather than as “electrical switches” under item 685.90. We reverse.
The imported merchandise consists of rotary television antenna switches made in Japan for Rembrandt in accordance with specifications in U.S. Patent number…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Midland International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- United States v. General Electric Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- United States v. Ampex Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Clipper Belt Lacer Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.