Amaco, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
This action involves the tariff classification of a “Strunck Ampoule Inspection Unite, Type ADG 500”, imported from West Germany and entered at Philadelphia in 1967. The record establishes that the unit is used by pharmaceutical manufacturers to inspect and check ampoules that are small bulbous glass vessels hermetically sealed to hold a solution for hypodermic injection under the skin.
Customs officials assessed the imported unit at 50 per centum ad valoiem under the TSUS (Tariff Schedules of the United States) item 710.90 classification as follows:
Optical measuring or checking…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BlissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Corning Glass WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Ataka America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.