Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cardoza

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1944No. Civ. 12678PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This appeal is by the defendants from a judgment determining that they owe plaintiffs $2,099.98 principal and $136.49 interest on a certain promissory note, and owe plaintiffs $350 attorneys’ fees; that all of said sums are secured by a deed of trust on certain real property in San Mateo County; and decreeing a foreclosure of the deed of trust. Defendants’ defense at the trial was that the promissory note involved provides for an usurious rate of interest. The trial court found contrary to this contention.

There are three couples, with divergent interests, who were actors in the transaction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Rice v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Baker v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. McCarty v. MellinkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Martter v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Shirley v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Ricord v. AragonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Atkinson v. WilckenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API