McCarty v. Mellinkoff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRICKE, J., pro tem.
The trial court sustained the demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend and plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment entered in favor of defendants. The complaint alleges that on November 28, 1928, plaintiffs borrowed from defendant Albert Mellinkoff the sum of $7,500, giving their promissory note therefor. By this note the makers promised to pay the principal sum “with interest from date hereof on unpaid principal at the rate of twelve (12) per cent per annum; principal and interest payable in installments of one hundred ($100) dollars on the 10th day of each…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Lazzareschi Investment Co. v. San Francisco Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- French v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Feldman v. Kings Highway Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.