In Re the Appeal of Hasting
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The authority given to municipalities in general to enact and enforce zoning ordinances by Art. 14, c. 160 of the General Statutes was, as to the City of Charlotte, enlarged by c. 123, S. L. 1955, to apply to a described area surrounding the city. The provisions of the 1955 Act applicable only to Charlotte are substantially the same as c. 1204, S. L. 1959, now G.S. 160-181.2. Pursuant to the authority given by the 1955 Act, Charlotte enacted a zoning ordinance which became effective 2 January 1956. One of the permissive uses of property zoned as "rural" is “dwellings except house trailers.”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Little v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by22 opinions
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Yancey v. HeafnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.