Legal Opinion

Levey v. Henderson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1917No. L. A. No. 4059PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Williams, Goudge & Chandler, and Goudge, Robinson & Hughes, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendants Henderson and Robinson appeal from the judgment.

The action is upon a joint and several promissory note dated January 19,1909, for two thousand dollars, payable six months after date, executed to the Merchants National Bank by P. E. Davis, Lester L. Robinson, M. O. Whelan, Geo. W. Henderson, and Geo. C. Peckham. M. O. Whelan died before the action was begun. P. E. Davis and Geo. C. Peckham made no defense and their default was entered. The present appeal involves only the defense made by Robinson and Henderson. The complaint alleges that about January 20, 1910, the Merchants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Light v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lyon v. United ModernsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ringgold v. Haven & LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Russell v. Pacific Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Smith v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Van Fleet-Durkee, Inc. v. OysterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Clyne v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Jack v. Wong SheeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. L. Grauman Soda Fountain Co. v. EtterArizona Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API