Legal Opinion

Viau v. Viau

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1922No. Civ. No. 4130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, as administrator of the estate of Mary H. Yiau, deceased, from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, who was the son of said deceased.

The complaint alleges that on January 2, 1903, Mary Yiau, now deceased, acquired title to lots 14 and 15, according to the plat of Orangedale, county of Fresno, California, and at said time said property was wholly unimproved except nine acres planted to young vines; that Mary Yiau was the mother of plaintiff, Will Yiau, and at the time she acquired title to said property and' on other occasions thereafter she…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Forbes v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Birchard v. SimonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API