Legal Opinion

Parker v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1992No. C009597PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case, we hold that a petition in probate, filed pursuant to Probate Code section 9860 (further statutory references are to the Probate Code unless otherwise indicated), initiates an “action” subject to the bar of the two-year statute of limitations for oral agreements set out in Code of Civil Procedure section 339, subdivision 1 (hereafter Code Civ. Proc., § 339(1)).

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1963, Fred Walker and Glen Crosley as coplaintiffs sued Robert and Berniece Prupas (Prupas) for breach of contract arising out of plaintiffs’ sale of a dry cleaning…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Day v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Avalos v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Harry S. Stonehill Robert P. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Vick v. DaCORSICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Moss v. Infinity Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API