Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from collecting an employer payroll tax levied against plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeals from a decree of the trial court dismissing the suit. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decree, ① whereupon plaintiffs filed this petition for review. We affirm.
Ordinarily we do not set forth in a written opinion the reasons for our denial of a petition for review. Where, however, a question of great public importance is presented, we regard it as onr duty to set forth the reasons for denying the petition for review.
We shall deal first…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HoareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Atlantis I Condominium Ass'n v. BrysonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Meyer v. LordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.