Legal Opinion

State v. Arceniega

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 3, 2004No. AC 24631PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In 2000, the defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of conspiracy to possess narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 21a-279 (a), conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 2 la-278 (b), and conspiracy to sell a controlled substance within 1500 feet of a public school in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 21a-278a (b). The trial court sentenced the defendant to a five year term of imprisonment for conspiracy to possess narcotics, a six year term of imprisonment for conspiracy to sell narcotics and a three year term of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. State v. RaucciConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. State v. ArceniegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. ColtherstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. GRANT v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  4. State v. ArceniegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API