Legal Opinion

State v. Raucci

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 22, 1990No. 8231PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court reimposing a total effective sentence of not less than fifteen nor more than thirty years, following the granting of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The sole issue is whether the trial court, when correcting an illegal sentence pursuant to Practice Book § 9351 after a multicount conviction has been partially set aside, may restructure the entire sentencing plan in order to effectuate its original sentencing intent. We hold that, under the facts of this case, the trial court had such authority, and, therefore, we find no…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Charles ShueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Kohlfuss v. Warden of Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API