Legal Opinion

State v. Coltherst

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 25, 2005No. AC 25175PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Jamaal Coltherst, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of numerous crimes resulting in an effective sentence of eighty-five years incarceration. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly denied his motion for a mistrial, (2) improperly admitted into evidence testimony from his prior trial, (3) improperly instructed the jury as to an element of larceny and (4) violated the prohibition against double jeopardy by sentencing him on his conviction of six counts of conspiracy offenses. We agree with the defendant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Almeida v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. State v. LutherConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. State v. McCleeseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API