Legal Opinion
State v. Arceniega
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 29, 2002No. AC 21144PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Roberto Arceniega, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to possess narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53U-481 and 2 la-279 (a),2 *290conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statues §§ 53a-48 and 21a-278 (b)*3 and conspiracy to sell a controlled substance within 1500 feet of a public school in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 21a-278a (b).4 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal, which motion was based on a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ColtherstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. ArceniegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004