Legal Opinion
Johnson v. D.M. Rothman Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 2012No. 10 Civ. 8269(VM)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Talbert Johnson (“Johnson”) and Troy Saunders (“Saunders;” and with Johnson, “Plaintiffs”), bring this action against their employer, defendant D.M. Rothman Company, Inc. (“Rothman”), for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), Articles 6 and 19, and the Labor-Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a).1 Plaintiffs claim that Rothman failed to include certain wage differentials owed to them under the governing Collective Bargaining Agreement…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Kaye v. Orange Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Mei Kum Chu v. Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Baguidy v. Boro Transit Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.