Legal Opinion
Baguidy v. Boro Transit Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2017No. 16–cv–3096(DLI)(RLM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORA L. IRIZARRY, Chief United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Louis Baguidy ("Plaintiff") filed the instant action against Defendants Boro Transit (also known as Consolidated Bus Transit Inc.) ("Boro") and Local 1181-1061, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO1 ("the Union," and together with Boro, "Defendants") alleging that Boro discriminated against him, retaliated against him when he complained of being subjected to discrimination, and created a hostile work environment under the New York State Executive Law (Human Rights Law § 296) ("NYSHRL") and the Administrative Code of the City of New…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunbar v. TracylockeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Parkinson v. 1199 SEIU National Benefit FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Parkinson v. 1199 SEIU National Benefit FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Rodriguez Perez v. First Tech Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Sarah Bell v. Maguire Chrysler LLC and Gabriel RugieroDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025