Legal Opinion

Bumgarner v. Reneau

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1992No. 9130SC116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered 28 August 1990, which judgment was based on a jury verdict finding that plaintiffs had failed to establish a prescriptive easement over defendants’ property.

Plaintiffs instituted this action seeking to permanently enjoin defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ use of a paved road leading from plaintiffs’ property across defendants’ property to U.S. Highway 441 in Jackson County. In their initial complaint, plaintiffs make the following pertinent allegations: that they have used the road without interruption and without permission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Milliken v. Denny.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Owens v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wright v. Town of MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Department of Transportation v. Elm Land Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Department of Transportation v. Roymac PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Town of Highlands v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Bumgarner v. ReneauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API