McCarthy v. Schuoler
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Appellant Loretta Schuoler challenges the trial court's authorization of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) pursuant to the involuntary commitment statute. We agree that the ECT hearing below violated both statu tory and due process requirements.
A friend brought Schuoler to the Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital on August 11, 1983. At that time Schuoler was disoriented and refused to take the medication that had been prescribed for her during an earlier admission. She had not been eating or sleeping well and was unable to communicate her birth date or address when questioned by the admitting mental…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- In the Matter of Marriage of TangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1995
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.