Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Marriage of Tang

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 1990No. 23523-1-IPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Gordon C.Y. Tang appeals from the trial court's order under CR 60(b), which vacated a dissolution decree and set aside the property settlement agreement incorporated in the decree. He asserts the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that the decree was defective because (1) it failed to list, characterize and evaluate the items of property owned by the parties, and (2) it left the parties as tenants in common of most of their property, thus failing to effectively dispose of the property. Mr. Tang also argues that the trial court did not have sufficient grounds under CR 60(b) to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McCarthy v. SchuolerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Postlewait Constr., Inc. v. Great American Ins. CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. In Re the Marriage of YearoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lane v. Brown & HaleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API