Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Frey

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1964No. Crim. 9012PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

By information filed, appellant Karl Frey and certain codefendants were charged with pimping and pandering and conspiring to commit these offenses.

The first count (conspiracy, in violation of Pen. Code, § 182) charges appellant Frey, Robert Kittridge, Jr., hereinafter called “Kittridge,” and Jack Phillips, hereinafter called “Phillips,” with conspiring and agreeing together, and with other persons, to commit the crimes of pimping and pandering. Six overt acts are charged in furtherance of the conspiracy which is alleged to have continued during the period between the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. AlamilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. PattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API