Legal Opinion

Lundberg v. Welles

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 15, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for discovery and inspection under Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., in this copyright infringement action. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. is the sole remaining defendant in this action, the other parties named as defendants not having been served with process. At the original trial, which resulted in a jury disagreement, Herman J. Mankiewicz and John Houseman, the writers of the allegedly infringing work, appeared as witnesses. Plaintiff now requests the production of all statements, reports and memoranda given by them to defendant, its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Rosseau v. LangleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  5. Forstmann Woolen Co. v. Manufacturers Retail Men's Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
  2. Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API