Legal Opinion

Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 3, 1969No. 66-C-360, 67-C-113PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendant has moved under rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for production of documents which are identified in answers to interrogatories. These documents, which are in the possession of the plaintiff, have been broken down into ten categories and relate to the following issues: validity or infringement of the Brainard patent, overlap between the Brainard and Morgan patents, implied license, unenforceability of the Brainard patent by reason of “unclean hands” and other inequitable conduct on the part of the plaintiff, and various antitrust…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  3. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  4. State Ex Rel. Dudek v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Richard Hauger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  4. Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re International Systems And Controls Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API