Legal Opinion
Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1960PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEYET, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for reargument of a determination regarding defendant’s objections to certain interrogatories propounded by plaintiff. The motion to reargue was granted.
The interrogatories now in question on reargument are Nos. 10, 22 and 28. These interrogatories, together with the objections of the defendant thereto, are as follows:
Interrogatory 10:
“Please state the substance in full of all the conversations and other communications by defendant’s attorneys with Hale, Kay & Grant and John Hoxie, giving the dates and places thereof; if any writings thereon were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.