Good v. Holstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
¶ 1 Appellants, Timothy and Donna Holstein, ask us to determine whether the trial court erred when it found them personally liable to Appellee, Ethan Good, in the amount of $315,841.18. We hold that the trial court improperly found Appellants personally liable and reverse the trial court’s judgment.
¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal are as follows. On May 29, 1992, Appellants’ corporation, Blue Mack, Inc., bought real estate at 401 West High Street in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, from Mrs. Smiths, Inc. (later “Eggo”). The parties executed a purchase money mortgage to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lumax Industries, Inc. v. AultmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Stonehedge Square Ltd. Partnership v. Movie Merchants, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Stonehedge Square Ltd. Partnership v. Movie Merchants, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Advanced Telephone Systems, Inc. v. Com-Net Professional Mobile Radio, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. SzymanskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hayes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Morton v. PennDOT, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.