Legal Opinion
Morton v. PennDOT
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Decided April 4, 2003No. 2771PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, J.,
OPINION1
INTRODUCTION
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (defendant PennDOT) argues on appeal that this trial judge erred in denying its motion for post-trial relief. This trial judge disagrees.
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 19, 2002, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (PennDOT), *268Southeastern Transportation Authority (SEPTA) and the City of Philadelphia (collectively, defendants) settled the underlying case with Alfred Morton (plaintiff) and requested the court’s intervention to determine and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Lory v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic MedicineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Slough v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sistemas Urbanos, Inc. v. Lugo RamosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004