Legal Opinion
Lumax Industries, Inc. v. Aultman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 29, 1995No. 82 W.D. Appeal Docket 1994PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
Lumax Industries, Inc. manufactures fluorescent fixtures. MCA, Inc. ordered and agreed to pay for fixtures which Lumax delivered to third parties. When MCA defaulted on payment, Lumax brought an action for breach of contract against Mary Carol Aultman individually and as the owner and operator of MCA, alleging that Aultman and MCA failed to pay for goods delivered. Lumax sought judgment against Aultman in the amount of $86,304.60 plus costs and interest.
In support of its claim that Aultman was individually responsible for the debts of MCA, Lumax alleged:
13…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wedner Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. Peggs Run Coal Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Eastern Minerals & Chemicals Co. Cary W. Ahl, Sr. v. Gary H. MahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- 718 Arch Street Associates, Ltd. v. BlatsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Advanced Telephone Systems, Inc. v. Com-Net Professional Mobile Radio, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.