Legal Opinion
Tomasino v. Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 26, 2014No. 13-CV-4692 (ERK)(JMA)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KORMAN, Senior District Judge:
On October 15, 2013, plaintiff Donna To-masino (“Tomasino”), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, filed an Amended Complaint seeking damages and injunctive relief against The Estee Lauder Companies Inc., Estee Laboratories, LLC, and Estee Lauder Inc. (collectively “Estee Lauder”) alleging five causes of action: (1) violation of Section 349 of the New York General Business Law; (2) violation of Section 350 of the New York General Business Law; (3) breach of an express warranty; (4) breach of the implied warranty of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Davis v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Hidalgo v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer CompaniesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Leiner v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.