Legal Opinion

Hidalgo v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 8, 2015No. 15-cv-5199 (SAS)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

I. INTRODUCTION

On July 2, 2015, Jinette Hidalgo filed a putative class action alleging that Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (“J&J”) had engaged in deceptive marketing practices with respect to certain of its products, including Bedtime Bath and Bedtime Lotion (collectively, the “Bedtime Products”). Hidalgo’s two claims — brought under New York General Business Law Section 349 (“Section 349”) and state common law — focus on J&J labels and advertisements indicating that the Bedtime Products are “clinically proven” to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Buonasera v. Honest Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Holve v. MccormickDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  5. Hu v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API