Hidalgo v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 2, 2015, Jinette Hidalgo filed a putative class action alleging that Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (“J&J”) had engaged in deceptive marketing practices with respect to certain of its products, including Bedtime Bath and Bedtime Lotion (collectively, the “Bedtime Products”). Hidalgo’s two claims — brought under New York General Business Law Section 349 (“Section 349”) and state common law — focus on J&J labels and advertisements indicating that the Bedtime Products are “clinically proven” to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Buonasera v. Honest Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Holve v. MccormickDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Hu v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.