Legal Opinion
Davis v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 3, 2018No. 17–cv–5191–ARR–RMLPublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Allyne R. Ross, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Josh Davis brings this putative class action against The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. ("Celestial") and Hain BluePrint, *331Inc. ("BluePrint") on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, seeking monetary and injunctive relief. He alleges that defendants, which manufacture and sell juice, have engaged in deceptive product labeling in violation of N.Y. General Business Law sections 349 and 350. Plaintiff also brings claims for fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment based on the same alleged conduct. Defendants have moved to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Berni v. Barilla S.P.A. v. SchulmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Colella v. Atkins Nutritionals, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Amadei v. NielsenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Campbell v. Freshbev LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.