Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lord

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2007No. 2007-0346PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This court admitted respondent, John A. Lord of North Royalton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0072696, to the practice of law in Ohio in 2000. After failing to register as an attorney for the 2005-2007 biennium, he was suspended *467from December 2, 2005, until January 18, 2006. See In re Lord, 107 Ohio St.3d 1431, 2005-Ohio-6408, 838 N.E.2d 671. We indefinitely suspended respondent’s license to practice on November 1, 2006, because he failed to file documents and appear in court for eight clients in six different cases, he did not truthfully account to his clients for his actions, and he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. MousheyOhio Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WagnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Dial v. BEIGHTLERDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API