Legal Opinion
Dial v. BEIGHTLER
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 22, 2010No. Case 3:08 CV 1592Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Objection (Doc. 29) of Petitioner Patrick Dial to the Report and Recommendation (R & R) of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 28). In accordance with Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208 (6th Cir.1981) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C), this Court has undertaken a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings to which Petitioner objects. For the reasons set forth below, this Court finds Petitioner’s Objection well-taken and the same is sustained.
Petitioner, a prisoner in state custody at the Marion Correctional Institute…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Gwendolyn T. Graham-Humphreys, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Vermont v. BrillonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.