Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Randall
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 16} I respectfully dissent. Based on Randall’s existing suspension from 2005, her failure to respond in this case, and the absence of any mitigating evidence, I believe that the appropriate sanction is an order to disbar.
{¶ 17} In Disciplinary Counsel v. Lord, 114 Ohio St.3d 466, 2007-Ohio-4260, 873 N.E.2d 273, ¶ 2, we disbarred an attorney after finding that he had mishandled several matters for various clients and had failed to cooperate in the investigation. We noted that when considering an appropriate sanction, our court considers “the duties violated, the actual or potential injury…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. LordOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SabolOhio Supreme Court · 2008