Helen Passaro, Individually and as of the Estate of Ramon Passaro v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals a judgment entered against it on October 23, 1984, by the United States Claims Court following its opinions in Passaro v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 395 (1984), and 5 Cl.Ct. 754 (1984). The judgment awarded the widow of a military retiree an accrued annuity and future benefits under the Armed Forces Survivor Benefit Plan, Pub.L. No. 92-425, 86 Stat. 706-713 (1972). 1 The appeal presents narrow but significant issues of Claims Court jurisdiction and statutory interpretation. We vacate and remand.
I
The Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) was enacted on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Passaro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Passaro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ralden Partnership v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Melendez Camilo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Pence v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.