Legal Opinion

Helen Passaro, Individually and as of the Estate of Ramon Passaro v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 25, 1985No. Appeal 85-927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, Circuit Judge.

The government appeals a judgment entered against it on October 23, 1984, by the United States Claims Court following its opinions in Passaro v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 395 (1984), and 5 Cl.Ct. 754 (1984). The judgment awarded the widow of a military retiree an accrued annuity and future benefits under the Armed Forces Survivor Benefit Plan, Pub.L. No. 92-425, 86 Stat. 706-713 (1972). 1 The appeal presents narrow but significant issues of Claims Court jurisdiction and statutory interpretation. We vacate and remand.

I

The Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) was enacted on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Passaro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Passaro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Ralden Partnership v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Melendez Camilo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Pence v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API